When an assembly wishes to do something it cannot do without violating its rules, which motion can it adopt?

When an assembly encounters a situation where it wishes to take an action that conflicts with its established rules, the appropriate way to address this is through the motion to suspend the rules. This motion allows members to temporarily set aside certain rules in order to proceed with a particular action that would otherwise be prohibited.

Suspending the rules can facilitate flexibility in the assembly's operations, enabling it to adapt to unique circumstances or urgent needs that arise. However, it is important to note that when using this motion, the assembly must specify which rules they are suspending, and typically a majority vote is required for the motion to pass.

Other motions listed, such as a point of order, serve different purposes. A point of order is used to raise a concern about a potential rule violation, but it does not facilitate action. Adjourn refers to ending the meeting, and a main motion initiates a discussion on a proposed action but requires the assembly to operate within its existing rules. By adopting the motion to suspend the rules, the assembly effectively gains the ability to act outside the constraints of its usual procedures in a temporary and controlled manner.