What type of motion can be adopted when an assembly wishes to do something that violates its rules?

When an assembly wishes to take an action that violates its existing rules, the appropriate motion to adopt is to suspend the rules. This motion allows the assembly to temporarily set aside certain rules to facilitate the desired action. It is important to note that suspending the rules usually requires a two-thirds majority vote, reflecting the assembly's consensus on the need to bypass standard procedures in a specific instance.

The rationale behind allowing the suspension of rules is to provide flexibility in procedural matters. In some cases, strict adherence to the rules may hinder progress or prevent the assembly from addressing urgent or important issues. Thus, this motion serves as a mechanism for the assembly to adapt its operations when necessary while still maintaining overall order.

Other choices, such as adjourning the meeting or taking a recess, do not directly address the need to bypass the rules for a specific action. Adjourning ends the meeting, while a recess merely pauses it without changing any rules. Amending the rules would involve a formal process to change the existing rules, which is more complex and not suitable for immediate needs.