What action can an assembly take to address the inability to follow regular rules?

The correct action that an assembly can take to address the inability to follow regular rules is to suspend the rules. This process allows the assembly to temporarily set aside certain procedural rules that may be hindering the conduct of the meeting. By suspending the rules, members can facilitate more effective discussion and decision-making in situations where strict adherence to the rules would create barriers or delays.

This action is particularly useful in circumstances where flexibility is needed for a specific agenda item or situation, enabling the assembly to proceed in a manner that may not conform to standard procedures, thereby fostering a more cooperative and efficient meeting environment. It is important to note that suspending the rules typically requires a minimum number of votes, as specified in the assembly's governing documents.

Other actions, like adopting a motion to close the meeting, are final actions that end deliberation without addressing the issues at hand. Voting on the motion to remain in order presumes that order has already been compromised and does not provide a way to adapt the existing rules. Lastly, revoting on the previous motion does not provide a solution for irregularities in rule adherence and merely restates an earlier decision without addressing the underlying procedural issues.